Why Teams Choose Noveum.ai Over Alternatives
The only platform built specifically for AI agents. Complete tracing, evaluation, and auto-remediation in one integrated solution.
There are several observability platforms available, but most are either too generic (designed for traditional software) or too specialized (focused on one aspect like evaluation). Noveum.ai is the only platform built specifically for AI agents, integrating tracing, evaluation, and auto-remediation.
30-80%
Understanding the Competitive Landscape
There are several categories of observability solutions, each with different strengths and weaknesses. Understanding these categories will help you choose the right solution for your needs.
General-Purpose Observability
Examples: Datadog, New Relic, Grafana
Strengths:
- Comprehensive monitoring for all types of software
- Mature, battle-tested platforms
- Wide integration ecosystem
Weaknesses:
- Not designed specifically for AI agents
- Require extensive configuration for AI metrics
- Expensive for AI-specific use cases
ML Model Monitoring
Examples: Arize, Fiddler
Strengths:
- Good for monitoring ML model performance
- Designed for data scientists and ML engineers
- Strong on model-specific metrics
Weaknesses:
- Designed for traditional ML, not AI agents
- Don't capture the full agent workflow
- No auto-remediation capabilities
LLM-Specific Observability
Examples: Langfuse, Braintrust, DeepEval
Strengths:
- Designed specifically for LLMs
- Good tracing and evaluation capabilities
- Strong developer experience
Weaknesses:
- Some are open-source with limited enterprise support
- Limited cost tracking and optimization
- Not designed specifically for agents
Noveum.ai: Built for AI Agents
Noveum.ai combines the best of all categories while being purpose-built for AI agents. Get complete tracing, comprehensive evaluation, and automated remediation - all in one integrated platform with enterprise-grade security.
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
See how Noveum.ai compares to other platforms across key features.
Core Features
| Feature | Noveum.ai | Arize | Langfuse | Braintrust | Datadog |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Auto-Remediation (AutoFix) | |||||
Error Localizer (NovaPilot) | |||||
AI-Powered Eval Pipelines | |||||
Agent-Specific Design | |||||
Complete Tracing | |||||
Hierarchical Traces | |||||
Evaluation Metrics (LLM-as-Judge) | |||||
Automated Evaluation | |||||
Prompt Management | |||||
Real-Time Cost Tracking | |||||
Cost Optimization Recommendations |
Enterprise Features
| Feature | Noveum.ai | Arize | Langfuse | Braintrust | Datadog |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In-VPC Deployment | |||||
SOC 2 Type II | |||||
GDPR Compliant | |||||
HIPAA Aligned | |||||
Role-Based Access Control | |||||
Audit Logging |
Framework Support
| Feature | Noveum.ai | Arize | Langfuse | Braintrust | Datadog |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LangChain | |||||
LangGraph | |||||
CrewAI | |||||
AutoGen | |||||
LlamaIndex | |||||
LiveKit Agents | |||||
OpenTelemetry Standard | |||||
Custom Agents |
Feature comparison based on publicly available information as of December 2024. Contact vendors for the most current information.
How Noveum.ai Compares to Each Competitor
Get an in-depth look at how Noveum.ai stacks up against each major competitor.
Noveum.ai vs. Arize
AI/ML Platform● Their Strengths
- OTEL-based tracing with experiments
- Prompt management and optimization
- LLM-as-Judge evaluation (online/offline)
● Their Weaknesses
- No auto-remediation or AutoFix capabilities
- No cost tracking or optimization features
- Not agent-specific (general AI/ML focus)
Noveum.ai Advantages
- Agent-Specific: Built specifically for AI agents, not general ML
- Error Localizer: Pinpoints exact traces where errors occur with reasoning
- Auto-Remediation: NovaPilot analyzes failures and suggests fixes
- AI Eval Pipelines: Makes observability actionable - no manual log review
Best For: Arize is best for general AI/ML experiments. Noveum.ai is best for production AI agents that need automated error detection.
Noveum.ai vs. Langfuse
Open Source LLM Platform● Their Strengths
- OTEL-based tracing with good observability
- Self-hosting and open-source options
- Strong enterprise compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA)
● Their Weaknesses
- No auto-remediation or AutoFix capabilities
- No cost tracking (still on roadmap)
- Not agent-specific (general LLM focus)
Noveum.ai Advantages
- Error Localizer: Pinpoints exact error locations with reasoning
- Auto-Remediation: NovaPilot suggests fixes automatically
- AI Eval Pipelines: No manual log review - eval makes sense of 1000s of traces
- 73+ Evaluation Metrics: More comprehensive than Langfuse evals
Best For: Langfuse is best for open-source observability. Noveum.ai is best when you need automated error detection at scale.
Noveum.ai vs. Braintrust
Evaluation Platform● Their Strengths
- Strong evaluation framework with playgrounds
- Production monitoring and automated scoring
- Loop AI agent for automation
● Their Weaknesses
- No tracing capabilities (not a core feature)
- No auto-remediation or AutoFix
- No cost tracking features
Noveum.ai Advantages
- Error Localizer: Pinpoints exact error traces with reasoning
- Auto-Remediation: NovaPilot suggests fixes automatically
- AI Eval Pipelines: Automates what's impossible to review manually
- Complete Platform: Tracing + Eval + AutoFix in one
Best For: Braintrust is best for evaluation-only. Noveum.ai is best when you need automated error detection that scales.
Noveum.ai vs. Datadog
General APM● Their Strengths
- Comprehensive APM and log management
- 1000+ integrations ecosystem
- Strong enterprise compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA)
● Their Weaknesses
- No AI/LLM-specific features
- No evaluation framework for AI
- No auto-remediation or cost optimization for LLMs
Noveum.ai Advantages
- Error Localizer: AI pinpoints exact error locations with reasoning
- AI Eval Pipelines: Makes sense of 1000s of traces automatically
- Auto-Remediation: NovaPilot suggests fixes - no manual log review
- Cost-Effective: Optimized pricing for AI-specific use cases
Best For: Datadog is best for general infrastructure. Noveum.ai is best for AI agents that need automated error detection at scale.
ROI Comparison
The choice of observability platform has significant financial implications. Compare the ROI of different platforms.
Monthly Cost Comparison
Typical monthly costs based on scale and usage.
Time-to-Value
How long it takes to get up and running.
Cost Savings with Noveum.ai
Typical savings our customers experience.
30-80%
Reduction in LLM API costs
70%
Faster debugging time
Proactive
Monitoring prevents incidents
Typical Payback Period
3-6 months
How to Choose the Right Platform
Use this framework to determine which platform is best for your needs.
Use Noveum.ai if...
You need a complete, integrated solution for AI agents with enterprise-grade features.
Consider These Alternatives If...
Each platform has its strengths for specific use cases
Use Arize if...
- You're focused on ML model monitoring
- You have a dedicated data science team
- You need model-specific features
Use Langfuse if...
- You want an open-source solution
- You have a limited budget
- You can manage your own infrastructure
Use Braintrust if...
- You're focused primarily on evaluation
- You want developer-friendly tooling
- Evaluation is your main use case
Use Datadog if...
- You need monitoring for all software
- You have diverse infrastructure
- You're willing to pay premium pricing
Use W&B if...
- You focus on ML experiment tracking
- You need model versioning & artifacts
- Your team is research-focused
Still not sure which platform is right for you?
Talk to an ExpertReady to Make the Switch?
See why hundreds of companies choose Noveum.ai. Get complete visibility, intelligent evaluation, and automated optimization for your AI agents.
Switching from another platform?
We'll help you migrate for free. Contact our team for details.
