SourceAttributionScorer
Evaluates quality of source attribution and citations in answers.
Overview
Evaluates quality of source attribution and citations in answers.
Use Cases
- RAG-based question answering systems
How It Works
This scorer uses LLM-as-Judge technology to evaluate responses. It prompts a large language model with specific evaluation criteria and the content to assess, then analyzes the LLM's judgment to produce a score and detailed reasoning.
Input Schema
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|
Output Schema
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| score | any | - |
| passed | any | - |
| reasoning | any | - |
| metadata | any | - |
Score Interpretation
Related Scorers
AggregateRAGScorer
Combines multiple retrieval scorers with weighted averaging for comprehensive RAG evaluation. Allows...
RAGAnswerRelevancyScorer
Evaluates how relevant the generated answer is to the input question. Assesses whether the response ...
RAGContextualPrecisionScorerPP
Computes precision for retrieved chunks using numerical relevance scoring. Precision = (Number of re...
RAGContextualPrecisionScorer
Measures precision of retrieved context by evaluating what fraction of retrieved chunks are actually...
Frequently Asked Questions
When should I use this scorer?
Use SourceAttributionScorer when you need to evaluate rag aspects of your AI outputs. It's particularly useful for rag-based question answering systems.
Why doesn't this scorer need expected output?
This scorer evaluates quality aspects that don't require comparison against a reference answer. It uses the system prompt and context as the implicit ground truth.
Can I customize the threshold?
Yes, the default threshold of 7 can be customized when configuring the scorer.
Quick Info
Ready to try SourceAttributionScorer?
Start evaluating your AI agents with Noveum.ai's comprehensive scorer library.
Explore More Scorers
Discover 112 calibrated LLM-as-Judge scorers for comprehensive AI evaluation