Hallucination ScorerLLM-as-Judge

FactualAccuracyScorer

Evaluates factual accuracy of output text against provided context. Assesses whether statements in the answer align with facts in the context, identifying inaccuracies and unsupported claims.

Overview

Evaluates factual accuracy of output text against provided context. Assesses whether statements in the answer align with facts in the context, identifying inaccuracies and unsupported claims.

hallucinationragsafetyllm-judgetrace-evaluationfactualtrust

Use Cases

  • RAG-based question answering systems
  • Safety and compliance monitoring
  • Hallucination detection in generated content

How It Works

This scorer uses LLM-as-Judge technology to evaluate responses. It prompts a large language model with specific evaluation criteria and the content to assess, then analyzes the LLM's judgment to produce a score and detailed reasoning.

Input Schema

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
output_textstrYesAnswer to verify for factual accuracy
input_textstrNoOriginal question
contextdict | str | listYesSource of truth for verification

Output Schema

FieldTypeDescription
scorefloatFactual accuracy score (0-10)
passedboolTrue if factually accurate
reasoningstrAccuracy analysis
metadata.issueslistFactual issues found
metadata.confidencefloatVerification confidence

Score Interpretation

Default threshold: 7/10

9-10ExcellentResponse fully meets all evaluation criteria
7-8GoodResponse meets most criteria with minor issues
5-6FairResponse partially meets criteria, needs improvement
3-4PoorResponse has significant issues
0-2FailingResponse fails to meet basic criteria

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I use this scorer?

Use FactualAccuracyScorer when you need to evaluate hallucination and rag aspects of your AI outputs. It's particularly useful for rag-based question answering systems.

Why doesn't this scorer need expected output?

This scorer evaluates quality aspects that don't require comparison against a reference answer. It uses the system prompt and context as the implicit ground truth.

Can I customize the threshold?

Yes, the default threshold of 7 can be customized when configuring the scorer.

Quick Info

CategoryHallucination
Evaluation TypeLLM-as-Judge
Requires Expected OutputNo
Default Threshold7/10

Ready to try FactualAccuracyScorer?

Start evaluating your AI agents with Noveum.ai's comprehensive scorer library.

Explore More Scorers

Discover 68+ LLM-as-Judge scorers for comprehensive AI evaluation